Pembicaraan:SR-71 Blackbird

The convention of naming is Maker-model#. (lockheed SR-71, Boeing 747, Airbus A-320, GD F-16)

Nickname is nice, but tend to be confusing because there are so many nickname for a plane. (The major wikis follows this convention, except en.) --Jwidjaja (bicara) 17:38, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Itu convention yang Anda buat. Walaupun belum ada ketentuan tersendiri di id.wikipedia, saya cenderung mengikuti naming convention dari en.wikipedia (en:Wikipedia:Naming conventions (aircraft)). borgx^{(kirim pesan)} 05:13, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

OK fine. if you want to follow en.wiki. Here is the best proposed convention. (eg. it will abandoned name-number generally thought to be informative/easy to call for most planes. This will depends on user language sophistication and knowledge of common nickname. Something that is detrimental for "short entries" currently prevalent in id.wiki. --Jwidjaja (bicara) 16:54, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

http://encyclopedia.kids.net.au/page/wi/Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_(aircraft)

A possible rough guideline - Use the most common unambiguous name/number.

Examples: F-4 Phantom II -- Douglas DC-3 -- De Havilland Tiger Moth[?] -- Supermarine Spitfire -- Mikoyan MiG-21 -- Airbus A-320[?] -- Dassault Mirage III

In general, this will be:

• US military aircraft: Number and name. F-15 Eagle, P-47 Thunderbolt Where there is no name, or where the name is not in general use, use the manufacturer and number instead: Lockheed U-2, Convair B-36[?], General Dynamics F-111, Curtiss P-40.

• UK aircraft: Manufacturer and name. Supermarine Spitfire, Hawker Fury[?] Where there is no name, or the name is not in general use, use manufacturer and number: e.g., Avro 504[?], BAE 111[?].

• US civil aircraft: Manufacturer and name or number as appropriate according to common usage: Boeing 707, Cessna Citation[?], Cessna 172, Convair 880 (not "Convair Skylark" or "Convair Golden Arrow". Try to avoid using name and number unless it is clearly needed for some reason. (I can't think of an example right now, but doubtless there are some.)

• Soviet aircraft: Manufacturer and number: Mikoyan MiG-21, Sukhoi Su-27, Tupolev Tu-144. (But there are exceptions: the Sturmovik is best known by that name.) Use of the NATO reporting name - which has absolutely nothing to do with the wishes of the people who designed, made, bought, and flew the aircraft - is offensive and should be avoided, though it can be mentioned as an alternative name in the text if appropriate.

• Japanese aircraft. Manufacturer and number. The US names ("Zeke", "Tony", "Betty", "Judy", and so on) are no better than, and probably even worse than the NATO reporting names for Soviet aircraft. Unfortunately, hardly anyone knows what the proper names are. On the whole, I am inclined to lean towards the view that we should go with the proper names even so, which are generally of the form Nakajima B5N[?] or Kawasaki Ki-61[?] - better known to us ignorant Westerners as the the 'Kate' and the 'Tony'. After all, we no longer write "Mao Tse-tung", we have learned to use "Mao Zedung". We can learn to use the proper Japanese names too. (And - damn it! - I can't find my best sourcebook for these! Looked everywhere.)

• Mixed origin aircraft such as the BAE Hawk[?] made under licence by McDonnell-Douglas/Boeing as the T-45 Goshawk[?], or a great many Westland helicopters made under licence from Sikorsky, not to mention the Soviet clones of the DC-3 and the B-29. A curly one. We just have to play these on their merits. Often, two seperate articles will be needed anyway - like the present Hawker Siddeley Harrier and AV-8 Harrier II. If not, primacy should usually go to the design manufacturer rather than the one making it under licence.

---

daftar artikel yang tidak mengikuti convensi nama en.wiki

http://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kategori:Pesawat_tempur

indonesia -- inggris

Alpha Jet -- Dornier Alpha Jet

Lavi --- IAI Lavi

JL-9 -- Guizhou JL-9

MiG-21 -- Mikoyan MiG-21

MiG-25 -- Mikoyan MiG-25

Saab_Gripen -- JAS 39 Gripen

YF-17 Cobra -- Northrop YF-17

Sayap X --- WTF?

--Jwidjaja (bicara) 17:34, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

External links found that need fixing (Oktober 2023)

Hello fellow editors,

I have found one or more external links on SR-71 Blackbird that are in need of attention. Please take a moment to review the links I found and correct them on the article if necessary. I found the following problems:

• http://www.sr-71.org/blackbird/sr-71/ is found to be dead. Recommend adding https://web.archive.org/web/20100317090246/http://www.sr-71.org/blackbird/sr-71/ to the original URL.

When you have finished making the appropriate changes, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information to fix any issues with the URLs mentioned above.

This notice will only be made once for these URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Melaporkan kesalahan) 15 Oktober 2023 00.29 (UTC)